About Proof of Audits

$16.65B already left on-chain after people trusted a report (DefiLlama). Not because there were no audits. Because a paid review still could not answer a wallet.

You pay, get a PDF, and people still sign while the code can move. Open contests make it worse: copies eat the pool, nobody owns the hard parts, and the drain can still sit in a function nobody was assigned. Proof of Audits runs a contest with 4x coverage, then keeps a live page that shows what was checked and if the code still matches. A firm PDF cannot close this. An open contest cannot close this. It is proof of a review, not a claim that a protocol is safe.

• Proof over promises. Public claims trace to addresses, hashes, reports, records, or named public sources.
• Evidence and limits together. A record states what was observed, what was not proven, and what evidence is still needed.
• No custody. Proof of Audits never needs a seed phrase, private key, or token approval to inspect public evidence.
• No safety guarantees. Verification can reduce uncertainty within a defined scope. It cannot certify that a protocol is safe or free from vulnerabilities.

Proof of Audits is the public operating name used across this website, product, communications, and public organization profiles. Formal contracting and billing details are provided directly during an engagement or institutional review.